Nine inputs.
Your organization as it stands.
Operating Cost Assumptions
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Loaded compliance FTE cost | $180,000 / yr | BLS + 40% benefits load |
| Loaded operations FTE cost | $130,000 / yr | BLS occupational data |
| P1+P2 average incident cost | $28,000 / incident | IDC enterprise IT 2025 |
| SLA breach rate (baseline) | 15% | Gartner ITSM 2025 |
| Avg service credit / breach | $8,500 | Enterprise SaaS surveys |
| Manual touchpoints / contract | 6 | Metaprise customer telemetry; kit cites 20–40 across full C2C |
| Cost per manual touchpoint | $95 | Hackett Group P2P benchmark |
| Audit prep cost (mid-large) | $500,000 / yr | Big-4 external + internal blend |
| Cost of capital (WACC) | 8% | US large-cap 2025 median |
Reduction Coefficients
Coefficients are conservative against Metaprise customer telemetry. Sales Kit Section 4 references 70–80% manual touchpoint reduction in P2P, 40–60% MTTR reduction, and compliance evidence preparation moving from 2–4 weeks to instant. This framework applies the lower bound of each.
| Driver | Reduction |
|---|---|
| D1 · Operational touchpoints | 70% |
| D2 · Cycle time | 70% |
| D3 · Compliance hours | 40% |
| D4 · Audit headcount equivalent | 30% |
| D4 · Audit prep cost | 75% |
| D5 · Financial cycle days | 21 days |
| D6 · MTTR | 50% |
| D7 · SLA breaches | 60% |
Formulas
D1= (Contracts × 6 touchpoints × $95 × 70%) + (Compliance hours × $90/hr × 30%)D2= (Contracts × Cycle days × 70% × Daily revenue contribution × 0.6)D3= Compliance hours × $90/hr × 40%D4= (Audit headcount × $180K × 30%) + ($500K × 75%)D5= (Financial volume × Avg txn value × 21 days × WACC) ÷ 365D6= Incident volume × $28K × 50%D7= Incident volume × 15% breach rate × $8.5K × 60%
The Mission budget is derived from operational volumes: compliance Missions (1 per 10 hours), contract Missions (4 per contract — onboarding, milestone, payment, audit), incident Missions (6 per incident), and financial Missions (5% of volume), priced at the industry-blended unit cost.
Coverage Curve
Year 1: 50% coverage — a conservative build-out as the Mission library is assembled across initial use cases. Year 2: 80% with cross-workflow expansion. Year 3: 100% baseline coverage. The curve runs below typical SaaS adoption to keep the headline defensible to a finance-heavy review.
Defensibility Notes for the CFO Conversation
- This is gross operational value, not pricing. Mission budget appears as a separate line — the figure your CFO can sign.
- Per-Mission ±5% band is structural. Metaprise absorbs cross-model variance (±60%), cross-execution variance (±40%), and context bloat at the platform level. This is Sales Kit Section 1's Pay-by-Result mechanism.
- Reduction coefficients are below the kit's published ranges. Adjust upward only when customer data warrants — never adjust downward, as the framework already runs conservative.
- Working-capital figure (D5) is the most variable. Calibrate avg transaction value against actual financial-execution data before presenting to a finance-heavy buyer.